Sickle Cell Disease — Research Summary
Printed from RareWays (rareways.com.au) on 5 April 2026
For general awareness only. Not medical advice. Discuss all care options with your healthcare team.
5 Most Recent Research Articles
- 1.
Cost-effectiveness of exagamglogene autotemcel gene-edited therapy in patients with sickle cell disease with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises in the United States.
Lopez Andrea et al. — Journal of medical economics (1 December 2026)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41730016/
- 2.
Decoding Sickle Cell Disorders Using Flow Injection Analysis Mass Spectrometry.
Putchen Deepalakshmi D et al. — Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM (30 June 2026)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41916763/
- 3.
Beyond HbS polymerization inhibition: Antioxidant and anti-hemolytic actions of two varieties of Vigna sesquipedalis (L.) F.Agcaoili in sickle cell disease.
Anorue Eleazar Chukwuemeka et al. — Journal of ethnopharmacology (12 June 2026)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41802513/
- 4.
A multi-feature alignment fusion neural network model for red blood cell aggregation classification using ultrasonic radiofrequency data of blood.
Guo Jinsong et al. — Artificial intelligence in medicine (1 June 2026)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41812384/
- 5.
Molecular Methods for Rare Hemoglobinopathy Cases: First Brazilian Report of Pediatric Siblings with Hb O-Arab and Alpha-Thalassemia.
Muynarsk Elisângela de Souza Miranda et al. — Pediatric blood & cancer (1 May 2026)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41834360/
Clinical Trials — Currently Recruiting (Australia)
Ask your doctor whether you or your child may be eligible for any of these trials.
- 1.
A Study to Evaluate How Well Etavopivat Works in People With Sickle Cell Disease
Recruiting — Phase 3 — Novo Nordisk A/S
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06612268
Source: RareWays research directory. Data from PubMed, Europe PMC, OpenAlex, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Always verify information with your healthcare team before making any decisions about your care.
Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease is an inherited blood disorder in which red blood cells become rigid and sickle-shaped, blocking blood flow and causing severe pain, organ damage, and increased infection risk. It is most prevalent in people of African, Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and South Asian descent. Australia has a growing population living with SCD, with newborn screening now expanding nationally.
Most Recent Research
OBJECTIVE: Exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) is a one-time nonviral gene-edited therapy approved in the United States (US) for treatment of patients aged ≥12 years with sickle cell disease (SCD) with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Standard of care (SOC) for SCD includes symptomatic care, hydroxyurea and/or red blood cell transfusions. This study estimated the long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of exa-cel relative to SOC among patients with SCD with recurrent VOCs. METHODS: A Markov model was used to compare the expected lifetime costs and clinical outcomes of patients with SCD with recurrent VOCs treated with exa-cel versus SOC from the US payer and societal perspectives. The model structure is based on disease severity, characterized by VOC frequency, which impacts the risk of developing SCD-related complications and mortality. The model incorporated data from the phase 3 pivotal CLIMB SCD-121 trial alongside published literature. Model outcomes included number of VOCs and other acute complications, proportion of patients developing chronic complications, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, exa-cel was projected to improve survival by 30.8 years (mean age of death, exa-cel: 74.5 vs. SOC: 43.6), reduce the number of VOC events by 77 (7 vs. 84), and reduce undiscounted disease-related costs by $3.34 M ($0.55 M vs. $3.89 M) compared to treatment with SOC. Patients treated with exa-cel also were less likely to experience acute complications or develop chronic complications compared to SOC. The ICER per discounted QALY for exa-cel versus SOC was $16,800 from the payer perspective; exa-cel was dominant (less costly, more effective than SOC) from the societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SOC, exa-cel was projected to considerably reduce the number of VOCs, improve survival, and reduce disease-related costs in patients with SCD. Exa-cel was projected to be a cost-effective treatment option.
This information is for general awareness only.
For guidance specific to your situation, please speak with your healthcare team.